User Tools
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| wiki:susrutaproject:03-su.sa:provisional-edition_sarirasthana [2026/08/01 15:55] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | wiki:susrutaproject:03-su.sa:provisional-edition_sarirasthana [2026/08/01 16:03] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| <head xml: | <head xml: | ||
| - | <note xml: | + | <note xml: |
| - | MS Kathmandu NAK 1-1079 (N) is a witness only up to 3.2.35, at which point | + | < |
| - | | + | |
| <lg xml: | <lg xml: | ||
| Line 980: | Line 980: | ||
| </lg> | </lg> | ||
| - | <p xml: | + | <lg xml: |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 2496: | Line 2496: | ||
| </lg> | </lg> | ||
| - | <p xml: | + | <lg xml: |
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 4178: | Line 4178: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | second chapter of the < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | >samudra ivodakaujasāṃ bhāvānām</ | ||
| + | implausible. It might mean "like the ocean is a support for creatures that take their | ||
| + | strength (< | ||
| + | language remain obscure and unlikely. Philipp Maas has suggested the minimal emendation | ||
| + | to < | ||
| + | palaeographically. It relies only on the confusion of the Nepalese characters <foreign | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | light of the other very rare instances of these parallels in Sanskrit literature. It is | ||
| + | hard to make grammatical or semantic sense of the Nepalese readings < | ||
| + | svaiṣām</ | ||
| + | Perhaps the original reading < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | and < | ||
| + | scribe might have normalized < | ||
| + | in order to make sense in the light of the following list of deities. If these | ||
| + | conjectures are correct, these changes must have happened very early in the | ||
| + | transmission, | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | quite different context.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | and H have daṇḍas after the < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | to < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | commentary unanimously read < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | witnesses do, that Puruṣa and Prakṛti are impermanent. Perhaps at an earlier point in | ||
| + | the text's transmission, | ||
| + | is used in every other qualifier in the list. This emendation is influenced by the very | ||
| + | similar wording of < | ||
| + | ....</ | ||
| + | in the Nepalese manuscripts is different than the vulgate: | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | amadhya-</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | disambiguates the sandhi.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | 210.7cd-8ab: | ||
| + | sūkṣmatarau mahadbhyaś ca mahattarau /</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | with witness N, against H and the vulgate, because <foreign xml: | ||
| + | dificilior potior</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | read < | ||
| + | vulgate.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | the passage and following the vulgate. The character <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | <foreign xml: | ||
| + | members of the dvandva. While rare, this usage has been observed: Wackernagel | ||
| + | 1896--1964, II.1, para 70.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | 1.1.22.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | to <foreign xml: | ||
| + | we separate <foreign xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | editions of the vulgate text offer two different solutions to the awkward phrase.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | have different readings at this point. <foreign xml: | ||
| + | included in the 1931 edition but omitted in the 1938 edition. There also seems to be | ||
| + | some textual confusion between <foreign xml: | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | this point. The vulgate adds a half-śloka <foreign xml: | ||
| + | ...</ | ||
| + | has about eleven passages that are absent in the vulgate. The vulgate' | ||
| + | then appears after 3.2.32. </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | editions, the editor Y. T. Ācārya noted that words to this effect were present in some | ||
| + | sources (1931 ed., p. 290, note 2; 1938 ed., p. 345, note 3).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | H adds a Newa comma after ṛtau in the next section, suggesting that the scribe thought | ||
| + | that was the start of a new section of text.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | sense.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | point, image A 1267_11_67.jpg, | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | même from <foreign xml: | ||
| + | 31.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | abraded top of the folio so that superscript vowels are uncertain. Witness H has a | ||
| + | scribal correction of the vowel <foreign xml: | ||
| + | here, with a feminine sentence subject, is neither the Nepalese nor the vulgate and is | ||
| + | almost certainly unoriginal. Without further evidence it is not possible to recover the | ||
| + | oldest reading.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | first member of the compound (Whitney 1250e).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | in witness H is likely to be a variant pronunciation rather than a scribal error.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | unavailable for the remainder of the < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | many.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | is not visually similar to <foreign xml: | ||
| + | witness L, which at least make good sense.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | but we have to emend to the retroflex for grammar and sense. In | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | so the emendation is certain.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | <foreign xml: | ||
| + | because of the gender difference with <foreign xml: | ||
| + | (n.).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | <foreign xml: | ||
| + | H.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | following the vulgate. MS H, our only witness to the Nepalese version at this point, is | ||
| + | badly damaged here and while it looks as if the akṣara is <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | been destroyed. The damaged portion may have supported the word <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | of the verse.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | the vulgate.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | vulgate reading.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | the vulgate, paraphrase the preceding sentence and may be a gloss.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | appears to be a contraction of <foreign xml: | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | (Oberlies 2003: 83-84).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | Add.2491, f.34r.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | is normally masculine, but here and in the < | ||
| + | (As. śārīrasthāna 5.20).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | for sense, with the vulgate, and in the light of the of the <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | the vulgate, for < | ||
| + | other passages describe single < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | metre.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | awkward and likely to have been corrected by a scribe. <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | the < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | point that do not appear in witness H. Or they may be a scribal omission by a saut du | ||
| + | même au même by the scribe of witness H from the word <foreign xml: | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | of these verses does not fit well in the context; in the eleventh--twelfth centuries the | ||
| + | commentators Gayadāsa and Ḍalhaṇa recorded doubts about their inclusion. Further | ||
| + | evidence from manuscripts that transmit early readings may clarify this issue.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | for correct sandhi.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | > | ||
| + | metre.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | 8.14cd: <foreign xml: | ||
| + | toyadāṃś ca ||</ | ||
| + | <foreign xml: | ||
| + | ||</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | >bhāvo ' | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | of the former is not clearly attested.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | passage (Hoernle 1907: 218--219).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | <foreign xml: | ||
| + | 283).</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | and is supported in witness H. It is hard to parse, partly because of the plurals in the | ||
| + | first pāda and the singular in the second. Some transmission problem is signalled by the | ||
| + | need for the emendation of H's <foreign xml: | ||
| + | xml: | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | tayor</ | ||
| + | corrollary in the next sentence.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | prādurbhāvo</ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <note target="# | ||
| + | Nepalese version into two parts. In witness H, the second part of this passage appears | ||
| + | after 3.10.65. Witness H is partially illegible here and the text has been emended based | ||
| + | on the vulgate.</ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||